An American
Quilt by Rachel May 2018
Have you had
difficulty in processing the words “systemic racism”? Did your schooling teach that slavery was basically something practiced by Southerners? If so, you may need to read Rachel May’s An
American Quilt.
It is not an
easy or quick read, but it is packed with content that may help you adjust your
thinking about racial issues in our country.
It took May years to pursue her investigations and after that there was
still the work of developing a strategy for communicating both the history and
the partly imagined stories of enslavement.
The
emotional thread of the book is carried by the author’s discovery of a group of unfinished quilt tops, their paper patterns,
and a cache of saved letters. That the quilt tops were never sewn together makes
the unfinished quilt a powerful metaphor
for our country’s racial history. We are all still in the process of working toward
“a more perfect union.”
The family she
highlights had both Southern and Northern roots. The key marriage involves a woman(Susan
Williams) from the North and a man from the South (Hasell Crouch). Susan’s new husband holds inherited enslaved
people as domestic staff and as she tries to rise in Charleston SC society, she
shows an easy adaptation to this situation. The enslaved people (Minerva, Eliza, Jane, and
Juba), whose history is little more than their first names, become the threads
that Ms. Day has to basically re-create. Given the paucity of records for people of
color, she must depend on casual comments in the old letters of white masters, a
few bills of sale that document the transfer of the enslaved to other owners,
and the generally available historical record.
You will
note in the preceding paragraph that I use the term “enslaved people” to refer
to what many of us were taught to call “slaves.” Ms. Law argues that we must revise
our language in order to begin revising our imprinted white supremacy. Using the term “enslaved peoples” imparts to
these departed souls some of the recognition they were denied during their
lives. They were real people. The difference was that the whites thought
that black and brown people were essentially sub-human. Thus it was easy to treat
them as objects that could be bought, sold, abused, or bequeathed. This is a real life example of what is known
in communication theory as the Sapir-Whorf
Hypothesis, which claims that the way a speaker structures language and
uses or speaks words affects that speaker’s own understanding of the world. i.e.your perceptions are partly controlled by
the spoken language you use. Add to this the brutal treatment of enslaved
peoples and the all too common sexual abuse of females by their masters and you have a crazy
quilt indeed.
One of many historical tidbits that I was unaware of was that women of color were identified by their main farming occupation and often
called “hoes. “ That
is, according to the author, the derivation of the word “whore.”
While
developing her story of the personal lives of enslaved people and their
masters, May also weaves another thematic thread. She effectively rebuts the long
lasting white perception that slavery, racism, and trafficking were mainly confined
to the South. She documents the
interconnections that the families and the owners of the Northern fabric mills,
the Northern distilleries, the Southern plantations, and the ships that trafficked
slaves and goods were participating in. She demonstrates that a large proportion of our
young country’s growing economic wealth was dependant on the labor of enslaved
people. The trade in human lives produced “an endless cycle that bound North
and South” and made the North just as culpable for slavery as the South. As May finally said “No one was clean of slavery.”
My admittedly
minor caveats to all this is that the book is 400 pages of small print with a
lot of less than well printed illustrations. There was a little too much detail
on sewing, fabric, and quilt making for me, but for someone with an abiding
interest in those items that would not be a negative. I also found it a challenge to process the
constant time jumps back and forth. The shifts too often included repetitions
of material that had already been treated. Thus I do think the enterprise could have
profited from a firmer editorial hand.
In spite of
these concerns, I learned some new things and was reminded of some things that
I had forgotten. I am definitely the better
for reading this book and will never again use the term “slave” when I can say “enslaved
people”.
No comments:
Post a Comment